Speeding Blog > Category: Scams & Scandals > “It Makes Enough Money Where It Is” — the Admission That Explains Britain’s Speed Camera Map

“It Makes Enough Money Where It Is” — the Admission That Explains Britain’s Speed Camera Map

A fixed speed camera on an urban UK road — sites are not always chosen for safety alone
Photo of author
By Adam Blair, Founder
| Last Updated
  • A former chief superintendent in Hull asked for a speed camera to be moved from outside a police station to an accident blackspot where there had been three serious crashes.
  • The reply he got, according to a city councillor who went public: it makes enough money where it is.
  • Here’s how camera sites are supposed to be chosen — and how the money really flows.

Back in 2017, a Labour councillor in Hull named Sean Chaytor stood up and told a story that Motorists across Britain had long suspected but rarely heard confirmed.

A former chief superintendent of police in the city had asked the local safety camera partnership to move a camera. Not scrap it — move it, from its spot outside the police station on Clough Road to a genuine accident blackspot on Beverley High Road, where there had been three serious crashes.

The response, in Chaytor’s account: “Well it makes enough money where it is, why should we move it?”

A senior police officer, trying to put a camera where people were actually being hurt, turned down on earnings grounds. Chaytor called it disgraceful, and pointed to something else on Hull’s camera map: the Daltry Street flyover camera, the highest-earning site in the entire fleet area, aimed at traffic heading out of the city.

How Camera Sites Are Supposed to Be Chosen

On paper, the system is casualty-led. Cameras are meant to go where the collision record justifies them — stretches of road where people have been killed or seriously injured, where slowing traffic demonstrably saves lives.

And to be fair to the partnerships that run them, they can point to results: one partnership’s own long-term figures claim an average 48 per cent reduction in the most severe injury crashes at camera-monitored locations over twenty years.

Nobody sensible objects to a camera at a blackspot. What the Hull story exposed is a different question entirely: what happens when the casualty-led logic and the revenue-led logic point at different bits of road?

In Hull, according to a former chief superintendent’s own experience, revenue won.

Follow the Money — It’s Cleverer Than You Think

Whenever camera revenue comes up, officials give the same reassurance: fine money doesn’t stay local. Every speeding fine goes to the Treasury’s consolidated fund — the general Government pot — so councils and partnerships supposedly have no financial incentive to catch you.

That’s true, and it’s also not the whole story.

Local authorities have to self-fund the capital and running costs of their camera sites. So how do camera partnerships stay afloat? The answer, recorded plainly in council committee papers: their costs are offset through the NDORS scheme — the fees Drivers pay for speed awareness courses.

Read that again. The fine goes to the Treasury, but the course fee flows back towards the enforcement system itself. Every Motorist who ticks the box for a course instead of points is helping fund the operation that caught them — and with well over a million Drivers taking courses each year, that is serious money.

A camera that catches nobody funds nothing. You can decide for yourself what that does to the incentives around where cameras sit.

Don’t miss a story: join the free DriveProtect newsletter — straight-talking updates for British Motorists.

What This Means When a Camera Catches You

Here’s the practical takeaway for you as a Driver: a camera’s location is a choice, made by people, under pressures that are not always about safety. And choices can be examined.

When a NIP arrives, the questions worth asking go beyond the number on the reading. Was the limit at that site lawfully signed? Was the device type approved, calibrated and correctly operated? Was the NIP itself valid and served in time? Prosecutions fail on these points far more often than the ticket-paying public ever hears.

Most Drivers never ask any of them. They see the photo, assume the machine must be right, and pay — exactly as the system is designed to expect.

DriveProtect™ Members take a different route. The moment a NIP lands, Members get direct access to a specialist Speeding Solicitor who reviews the case and advises them exactly what to respond, for a fraction of the normal cost of legal help.

The war on the British Motorist, straight to your inbox

Join the free newsletter — straight-talking updates on speed cameras, enforcement, and your rights as a Driver.

Join the Newsletter

Got a NIP or points on your licence right now? See how DriveProtect Membership works — a specialist Speeding Solicitor in your corner from £25/month.

This article is general commentary on motoring law and enforcement in England and Wales. It is the opinion of the author and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different -- for advice on your own situation, speak to a specialist Speeding Solicitor.

NEWSLETTER

The war on the British Motorist, straight to your inbox

Join the free newsletter — straight-talking updates on speed cameras, enforcement, and your rights as a Driver.